پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 543 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,295 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,037,477 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,973,703 |
بررسی تأثیر پیوندهای خانوادگی بر مؤلفههای مرتبط با توسعه در ایران | ||
| جامعهشناسی نهادهای اجتماعی | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 26، اسفند 1404، صفحه 65-95 اصل مقاله (784.85 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ssi.2025.28938.2270 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فاطمه مدیری* | ||
| دانشیار جامعهشناسی، گروه مطالعات خانواده، مؤسسۀ تحقیقات جمعیت کشور، تهران، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 17 فروردین 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 24 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 مرداد 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| اهداف: تأثیر روابط مثبت خانوادگی بر برخی ابعاد زندگی فردی و اجتماعی بر کسی پوشیده نیست، اما برخی مطالعات نشان داده، تأثیر پیوندهای خانوادگی قوی بر برخی از مؤلفههای مرتبط با توسعه محل مناقشه است. بر اساس این، در این مقاله به بررسی تأثیر پیوندهای خانوادگی بر نگرشها و رفتارهای مرتبط با رشد اقتصادی، مشارکت سیاسی، اشتغال زنان و اعتماد پرداختهایم. روش مطالعه: دادههای مقاله برگرفته از پیمایش ملی ارزشهای جهانی در ایران بوده که در سال 1399 و با 1499 نمونه انجام شده است. در دستیابی به اهداف تحقیق از روش تحلیل ثانویه و از نرمافزار اسپیاساس در توصیف دادهها و از آزمونهای آماری خیدو، کندال و رگرسیون لجستیک در تحلیل دادهها استفاده شده است. یافتهها: یافتهها نشان داده که بین پیوندهای خانوادگی با مؤلفههای مرتبط با رشد اقتصادی، اعتماد میانفردی، اشتغال زنان و مشارکت سیاسی رابطۀ معنادار نداشته و با اعتماد تعمیمیافته رابطۀ معنادار داشته است. نتیجهگیری: بهطورکلی میتوان گفت که در جامعۀ ما، پیوندهای خانوادگی بر مؤلفههایی که مستلزم توسعه و بقا در جهان مدرن است، تأثیر منفی ندارد و در بیان تأثیر روابط خانوادگی بر دیگر ابعاد مختلف زندگی اقتصادی اجتماعی، درنظرداشتن ناهمگونی بین کشورها ضروری است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| اشتغال زنان؛ اعتماد؛ پیوندهای خانوادگی؛ رشد اقتصادی؛ مشارکت سیاسی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Study on the Impact of Family Ties on the Components Related to Development in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fateme Modiri | ||
| Associate Professor of Sociology, Family Studies Department, National Institute for Population Research, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: The impact of positive family relationships on some aspects of personal and social life is clear to anyone. But some studies have shown that the impact of strong family ties on some components related to development is disputed. Based on this, the present research investigated the impact of family ties on attitudes and behaviors related to economic growth, political participation, women's employment, and trust. Methods: The data was taken from the national survey of global values in Iran in 2019, which was conducted with 1499 samples. The secondary analysis method was used to achieve the research objectives. SPSS software was used to describe the data, and Chi-square, Kendall, and logistic regression statistical tests were used to analyze the data. Results: The findings showed that there was no significant relationship between family ties and components related to economic growth, interpersonal trust, women's employment, and political participation, and there was a significant relationship with generalized trust. Conclusion: In general, it can be said that in our society, family ties do not have a negative impact on the components that require development and survival in the modern world, and in expressing the impact of family relationships on other different dimensions of economic and social life, it is necessary to consider the heterogeneity between countries. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Women's Employment, Trust, Family Ties, Economic Growth, Political Participation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
صانعی درهبیدی، منوچهر و رضایی، مهران. (1388). پژوهشی در «مسألۀ آدام اسمیت»: سازگاری یا ناسازگاری نظام اخلاقی و اقتصادی اسمیت. شناخت، 61، 127-84.
صباغچی، مریم؛ عسکری ندوشن، عباس و روحانی، علی (1403). آونگ مراقبت، از تعلیق تا استمرار؛ یک مطالعۀ کیفی از مراقبان خانوادگی سالمندان در شهر یزد. جامعهشناسی نهادهای اجتماعی، 11(24)، 168-133.
مهدوی، محمد صادق و مدیری، فاطمه (1396). بررسی نسلی ارزشهای پستمدرن خانوادگی و عوامل اثرگذار بر آن با تأکید بر نقش دینداری. جامعهشناسی نهادهای اجتماعی، ۴(۹)، ۱87-۱55.
doi:10.22080/ssi.2017.1563
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation reply. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401. doi: Alesina, A., & Ferrara E. L. (2002). Who trust others? Journal of Public Economics 85, 207-34. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6 Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2007). The power of the family. V NBER Working Papers 13051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. http://www.nber.org/papers/w13051 Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution, NBER working paper, IZA DP No. 4056. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14825 Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2011). Family ties and political participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 817-839. Alesina, A., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Family values and the regulation of labor. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 599-630. Alesina, A., Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family. J Econ Growth 15, 93–125. doi: 10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The quarterly journal of economics, 128(2), 469-530. doi: Alesina, A., Ichino, A., & Karabarbounis, L. (2009). Gender based taxation of family chores. Harvard University, mimeo. doi: 10.1257/pol.3.2.1 Algan, Yann, & Pierre Cahuc. (2005). The roots of low european employment: family culture? NBER international macroeconomics annual, ed J. Frenkel and C. Pissarides, 65–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://www.nber.org/books/fran07-1 Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). Political culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Center for International Studies, Princeton University. doi: Antecol, H. (2000). An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates. Labour Economics, 7(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00007-5 Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society, New York: The Free Press. Bentolila, S., & Ichino, A. (2008). Unemployment and consumption near and far away from the mediterranean. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 255-280. doi: 10.1007/s00148-006-0081-z Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73-96. doi: 10.1257/jep.20.2.73 Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2001). The economics of cultural transmission and the evolution of Preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 298-319. doi: Blekesaune, M. (2022). Does the nuclear family affect social trust? longitudinal evidence from germany. European Societies, 24(2), 111-128. doi: Cheng, W.Y., Cheung, R.Y., & Chung, K.K.H. (2021). Understanding adolescents’ perceived social responsibility: The role of family cohesion, interdependent self-construal, and social trust. Journal of Adolescence, 89, 55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.04.001 Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228943 Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Daniele, G., & Geys, B. (2016). Family ties and socio-economic outcomes in high vs low-income countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(6), 813-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1098630 Duranton, G., Rodríguez‐Pose, A., & Sandall, R. (2009). Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe. Economic Geography, 85(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.01002.x Ermish, J.; & Gambetta, D. (2008). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? ISER WP 2008-37. Ferna´ndez, R., & Fogli, A. (2006). Fertility: The role of culture and family experience. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2–3), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.552 Ferrara, L. (2003), Kin Groups and Reciprocity: A model of credit transactions in Ghana, American Economic Review, 93(5), 1730-1751. doi: Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity, New York: Free Press Galasso, V., & Profeta, P. (2018). When the state mirrors the family: the design of pension systems. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(6), 1712-1763. http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvx046 Gambetta, A. (1990), The Sicilian mafia. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Blackwell. Giuliano, P. (2007). Living arrangements in western europe: does cultural origin matter? Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(5), 927-952. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.5.927 Glaeser, E., La Porta, R.F., & Lopez de Silanes Shleifer, A. (2004), Do institutions cause growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271-304. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.556370 Glaeser, E., Ponzetto, G., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Why democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12 (2), 77-99. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12128 Greif, A., & Tabellini, G. (2012). The clan and the city: Sustaining cooperation in china and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271-304. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101460 Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic perspectives, 20(2), 23-48. doi: 10.1257/jep.20.2.23 Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Social capital as good culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2-3), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.2-3.295 Hout, M., & Rosen, H.S. (2000). Self-employment, family background, and race. Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 670 –92. doi: 10.2307/146367 Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary data analysis: A Method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 3, 619 –626. Ljunge, M. (2011). Civic virtues, family ties, and political participation. In Lisbon meeting on institutions and political economy, 1-20. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/35418 Mahdavi, M. S., & Modiri, F. (2017). Generational analysis of postmodern family values and its determinants: With emphasis on the role of religiosity. Sociology of Social Institutions, 4(9), 155-187. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2017.1563 North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Norton. Putnam (1993). Making democracy work. civic traditions in modern italy, Princeton-NJ: Princeton University Press. Rosenzweig, M.R., & Stark, O. (1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 905-926. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1832196 Sabaghchi, M., Askari-Nodoushan, A., & Ruhani, A. (2025). The pendulum of care from suspension to continuity: A qualitative study of family caregivers for the elderly in Yazd, Iran. Sociology of Social Institutions, 11(24), 133-168. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22080/ssi.2024.27187.2200 Sanei, M., & Rezae, M., (2010). A research in the “Adam Smith Problem” consistency or inconsistency of Smith’s ethical and economical system. Shinakht, 61(2), 84-127. [In Persian]. http://fa.journals.sid.ir/ViewPaper.aspx?id=226789 Tabellini, G. (2008). The scope of cooperation: values and incentives, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (3), 905-950. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.905 Todd, E. (1985). The explanation of ideology: family structures and social systems. Oxford [Oxfordshire]; New York, NY, USA: B. Blackwell. Todd, E. (1990), L’invention de l’europe, Paris: Seuil. Weber, M. (1904). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, New York: Scribner’s Press.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5 |
||