پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 440 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,284 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,851,619 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,080,499 |
Language Learning Opportunities in the Online Wild | ||
| Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching | ||
| دوره 1، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 69-86 اصل مقاله (340.55 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/iselt.2021.21516.1011 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sajjad Pouromid* 1؛ Khatereh Hosseininasab2 | ||
| 1Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Kansai University, Japan | ||
| 2Ph.D. Candidate, Osaka University, Japan | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 22 آذر 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 07 بهمن 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 بهمن 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Recent research has heralded the role of social interaction in learning a second language. While earlier cognitive approaches to language learning attracted attention to individual factors involved in the process, social approaches regard learning as a pluralistic attempt which is materialized through participation. This shift in focus is important because it entails the study of language learning as it occurs in its natural habitat of social interaction rather than limiting it to formal educational settings. Mainstream SLA research has suffered from this limitation, with most studies in the field opting for experimental or quasi-experimental designs. Although informative in many respects, such studies lack the ecological validity to explore how learners approach the task of language learning in the real world. To address this issue, the study of language learning in the wild (outside formal educational settings) has gained momentum. The present study takes a similar approach to explore the affordances online learner-learner interactions may offer for language learning. Rather than tracking and measuring learning, it seeks to understand the potentials such interactions may have for language learning particularly because they happen in the absence of teachers. It builds upon data collected from video calls among Japanese and Taiwanese learners of English, transcribed and analyzed with a conversation analytic lens. The findings indicate that online interactions outside classroom provide learners with opportunities for extended negotiations for meaning, besides being a space for developing awareness for how interactions are structured in conversations taking place in the real world. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Social interaction؛ Second language learning؛ Learning in the wild؛ Conversation analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Carroll, D. (2004). Restarts in novice turn beginnings: disfluencies or interactional achievements? In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second Language Conversations (pp.201–219). London: Continuum. Curl, T. S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1257-1280. Dings, A. (2014). Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 742-756. Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29-45. Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (1994). Second Language Acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Hellermann, J. (2011). Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek-Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development(pp. 147–172). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Hellermann, J., Eskildsen, S. W., Pekarek-Doehler, S., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action: The complex ecology of second language interaction "in the wild". Cham: Springer Nature. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. Kääntä, L. (2010). Teacher turn-allocation and repair practices in classroom interaction: A multisemiotic perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland. Kasper, G., & Burch, R. A. (2016). Orienting to focus on form in the wild. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 198–232). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In R. William & B. Tej (Eds.). Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471-497. McLaughlin, M. (1984). How talk is organized. Beverley Hills: Sage. McMeekin, A. L. (2017). L1-L2 speaker interaction in a study abroad setting: Communication strategies, word searches, and intersubjectivity. SARSLAIA, 2(2), 263-294. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–405. Pekarek-Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 3–24. Pekarek-Doehler, S., Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno, & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 233-270). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 555–578. Pica, T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker-nonnative speaker negotiation: what do they reveal about second language learning. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and Context: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Language Study (pp. 198-213). Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 152-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sacks, H. E., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language Awareness, 50, 696-735. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 89–327. Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Sert, O. & Balaman, U. (2018). Orientations to negotiated language and task rules in online L2 interaction. ReCALL, 30(3), 355-374. Smith, B. (2005).The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33–58. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2019). Ohja. ja. ja. (‘ohyes. yes, yes.’): Providing the appropriate next relevant action in L2 interaction. In R. M. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 125-141). New York: Routledge. van der Zwaard, R. & Bannink, A. (2016). Nonoccurrence of negotiation of meaning in task-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 625–640. Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–101). Berlin: De Gruyter. Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge. Walsh, S. (2014). Developing classroom discourse competence. Language Issues, 25(1), 4-14. White, K. (2019). Interactional competence and study abroad: Empirical methods, findings, and pedagogical implications. In R. M. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence (pp. 192-212). New York: Routledge. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routlege. Yuksel, D. & Inan, B. (2014). The effects of communication mode on negotiation of meaning and its noticing. ReCALL, 26(3), 333–354. Zheng, D., Young, M. F., Wagner, M. M. & Brewer, R. A. (2009) Negotiation for action: English language learning in game-based virtual worlds. The Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 489–511. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 226 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 232 |
||